Forensic accounting
Risk scoring, charge/lender exposure, accounts status and officer churn are combined as review-priority signals.
Scientific controls
Validation, source hashes and output manifests support reproducibility.
Market intelligence
Sector and regional corporate-stress signals support research, not investment advice.
Executive narrative
May 2026 public briefing summarising Companies House review-priority indicators. The public site is redacted and pseudonymised; it is intended for research and triage, not allegations, credit decisions, investment advice or legal findings.
Risk populations
- 5,168,399 active companies in the current public universe.
- 3,693,966 records have one or more review-priority indicators.
- 141,069 companies are flagged as at-risk within the public current screen.
- 6,878 high-risk and 35 critical-risk records are retained for controlled review.
Industry and filing themes
- The largest SIC concentrations include real estate, property trading, management consultancy and business-support activities.
- A material subset of companies have no SIC supplied, which remains a quality-control and interpretation issue.
- Accounts and confirmation-statement timeliness remain central review-priority signals.
Geographic concentration
- The strongest registration clusters remain concentrated in London and other high-volume registered-office locations.
- Public reporting should continue to use aggregate address clusters and postcode districts rather than naming individual companies in risk context.
- Protected operational dashboards retain fuller fields for authorised review.
Controls and provenance
- Monthly snapshots, source hashes, validation modules and archived artefacts are retained.
- Public payloads should expose pseudonymised companies and aggregated clusters only.
- Protected unredacted outputs remain separated under the access-controlled dashboard.